If there was an antipsychiatry and an antipsychoanalysis, why not an antipsychology? Dialogues with Martín-Baró

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20220036

Keywords:

Psychology, Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, Criticism, Marxism

Abstract

The present work contains an introduction to the translation into Brazilian Portuguese of the article Antipsychiatry and antipsychoanalysis (Antipsiquiatria y antipsicoanálisis), by Ignacio Martín-Baró (1973/2022). It discusses fundamental aspects, contextualizing it, reiterating its relevance, and advancing in the debate to which it proposes, namely: the criticism and transformation of the psych field (psychiatry, psychology, and psychoanalysis). We aim to encourage the debate on the critique of psychology in a radical perspective, from Marxism. Is it not up to us to build an antipsychology, like antipsychiatry and antipsychoanalysis? A subsumption of psychology, in the sense of affirming it, but also denying it and producing itself as a negation of negation? If for Martín-Baró (1973), for a new society to emerge, this science (psychology) must stop being not only this science, but ours, for us, it must also cease to be, it must be overcome.

Author Biography

Pedro Henrique Antunes da Costa, Universidade de Brasília

Doutor em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), é Professor da Universidade de Brasília (UnB).

Published

2023-11-23

How to Cite

Costa, P. H. A. da. (2023). If there was an antipsychiatry and an antipsychoanalysis, why not an antipsychology? Dialogues with Martín-Baró. Estudos De Psicologia (Natal), 27(3), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20220036

Issue

Section

Seção Especial – Ignacio Martín-Baró