Reducing the Dichotomy Between the Prescribed and Real Leadership Models
Abstract
Organizational practice indicates the existence of a dichotomy between the prescribed (MLP) and real (MLR) leadership models. The present study investigates the existence of this dichotomy and presents a proposal for its reduction. The bibliographic research was carried out in the Scopus and CAPES databases, with methods for prioritizing scientific articles. For data collection, semi-structured interviews with specialists were used, based on the Critical Incident Technique, applied to 10 professionals. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data analysis is based on Grounded Theory, with the aid of the “NVivo ™” software, version 11.0. Lexical analysis methods were used. The results indicate that, for 100% of the sample, there is a dichotomy between PLM and RLM. The product of this research is a proposal, without validation of the model. The study contributes to the advancement of theory in the field of leadership and to the improvement of its practice.
Keywords: leadership, strategic management of people, organizations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All opinions expressed in the manuscripts are the sole responsibility of the authors.
The authors retain the copyright to the published articles and grant the journal *Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho* (rPOT) the right of first publication.
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, allowing for their sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation, provided that the original publication in rPOT is properly cited.
All published articles receive a permanent digital identifier (DOI).
Manuscripts must adhere to the principles of scientific integrity and originality. The reproduction of excerpts, figures, tables, or other previously published materials must comply with copyright laws and citation standards and, when necessary, be accompanied by authorization from the respective rights holders.
