Evidências de Validade da Escala de Impacto do Treinamento de Liderança na Vida Profissional

Vivian dos Santos Miranda; Gardênia da Silva Abbad; Letícia Mara de Lima Meira; Aline de Sousa Nascimento; Fernanda Drummond Ruas Gaspar

Evidence of Validity of the Leadership Training Impact Scale in Professional Life

Authors

Vivian dos Santos Miranda University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-3772
Gardênia Abbad University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-3549
Letícia Mara de Lima Meira University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-7154
Aline Nascimento University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2205-4651
Fernanda Gaspar University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-2995

Abstract

Organizations and researchers continuously investigate the impact of training and development programs on the work of graduates. The effect of training consists of how much the training contributed to the change in behavior in the graduate's position. This research was conducted to adapt and investigate evidence of the psychometric validity of a scale for assessing the impact of leadership training on the professional lives of graduates. It was carried out in a large financial organization in Brazil, with the participation of 1,482 employees, through an electronic questionnaire. A leadership development program for women was evaluated from 2021 to 2022, with the voluntary involvement of both men and women. The scale was subjected to exploratory and semi-confirmatory factor analyses, in addition to descriptive statistics. The results indicated that the scale has evidence of validity, accuracy, and reliability, and can be applied in different organizational contexts.

Keywords: training, leadership, statistical validity.

Downloads

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published

2024-12-13

Issue

Vol. 24 No. contínuo (2024): Volume 24

Section

Empirical Research Reports

License

All opinions expressed in the manuscripts are the sole responsibility of the author. On submitting a manuscript to the rPOT, the author represents that: 1) this same manuscript is not under consideration in another periodical, national or otherwise; 2) he/she is willing to wait during the manuscript processing time, and is also aware that, once accepted, the manuscript may have to stay on hold due to the journal's rule of publishing only two (2) articles from authors at the same institution per edition, ensuring its geographical diversity; 3) once accepted, the article becomes the journal's property and may not be reproduced without its consent, which will be granted upon the author's written request.

Texts that contain excerpts from other publications must necessarily obey the limit of 500 words, to avoid constituting plagiarism, or self-plagiarism, or thus violating the principle of originality. Extreme caution is recommended in reproducing figures, tables, and other resources excerpted from third-party works. Should it be necessary, their publication will only be accepted by the journal if they come accompanied by a letter of authorization from the author/owner of the original work.

If the manuscript is accepted, the author must submit a copyright assignment letter, according to the model which can be obtained here. All authors must sign the same letter and send it to the email by which they were notified of final acceptance of the manuscript.